Live support
We are sorry, but support is not available at the moment.
27
Jul
2011

iCame, iSaw, iConquered: iPod, iPhone, iPad…

POSTED BY Global Administrator
If you said the iPad was a gimmick when you first heard about it, you are probably keeping it rather quiet now. Apple’s latest portable device has been another success, and possibly its most successful in terms of initial sales. Yes, it has benefitted from those that came before because of the company’s enhanced brand; but 29 million iPads in the first five quarters since launch (compared to 0.6 million iPods, and 6 million iPhones in corresponding periods) makes it by far Apple’s most successful portable in this respect. iPhone sales went up a notch with the first 3G model, while lower cost iPods arguably put sales of this type of device into a higher gear, but the iPad has hit the ground running. Where does this leave Apple’s other devices? iPod shipments have declined year-on-year since 2008 as smartphones with MP3 playback capability ate into this market in general, but the record 20 million iPhones shipped in the last quarter indicates that the market for smartphones remains healthy. As we forecast in our recent smartphones report, we expect smartphone shipments to more than triple, from 302 million in 2010 to 1.0 billion in 2016. However, we predict that nearly a third of these to have an unsubsidised retail value of $150 or less, with many more in the standard smartphone price band ($151-$399). While the current iPhone model continues to sell strongly, a new one is now due – according to most estimates, September. There has been some speculation that the next iPhone could be a ‘Nano’, suggesting a lower-cost, smaller version (as happened with the iPod). However, Juniper Research does not believe this will be the case. For one, a new model alone has always seen sales pick-up – though they hardly need it at the moment. Furthermore, while hitting a lower price point with a device that sold at full retail price was necessary, iPhones are significantly subsidised by mobile network operators. Also Apple seems to have found an effective strategy by continuing to ship a lower memory version of the previous model (8GB iPhone 3GS) for those who want a lower-cost alternative. Finally, Apple’s main competitors in the premium smartphone market have already launched devices with larger screens (4.3”, compared to iPhone 4’s 3.5”), dual-core processors and 3D, for example. While its latest results are impressive – to continue the theme of this blog’s title – this is no time for Apple to rest on its laurels. So expect the next iPhone to be a flagship device, not a mass market model.